Applied Knowledge

Soon To Be Released: GSA Interpretation of 2010 ISC Physical Security Criteria for Federal Facilities

Stone Security Engineering recently supported the General Services Administration in developing an engineering based interpretation of the 2010 ISC Physical Security Criteria for Federal Facilities. GSA’s new document is scheduled for release in September.  The new GSA document will address blast and progressive collapse requirements and will be applicable to all GSA buildings and other facilities, covered by the ISC Physical Security Criteria for Federal Facilities, that are classified as FSL III or IV.

The 2010 ISC Physical Security Criteria for Federal Facilities superseded the ISC Security Design Criteria for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects, September 29, 2004 and the ISC Security Standards for Leased Space, September 29, 2004.  There are many differences between the Current and Superseded documents that may result in significant differences on the final design of buildings. It is important that project teams understand these differences early in project design and planning so that they may be effectively implemented.

Stone Security Engineering will be providing face to face and web-based training as soon as the document is released.  Send us an email at info@StoneSecurityEngineering.com if you are interested in participating.

Did you know….’What’s In a Spec’?

In previous briefings, we discussed blast resistant film installations, blast basics, and the relationship between standoff distance and protection.

This post continues our information sharing by discussing the two basic types of specifications and specific types of information that we recommend be included when specifying blast resistant products.

Generally, there are two primary categories of specifications: Prescriptive and Performance.

Prescriptive Specifications: This type of specification is generally used for mitigation measure solutions which are fully designed and analyzed by the design team. These may include built-in-place solutions such as new concrete walls, installation of geotextile “catcher” solutions for non-structural walls, built-in-place anti ram barriers such as bollards, etc. Prescriptive requirements such as specific material types, strengths, and in some cases, installation requirements would be included in these specifications. The accompanying drawings would include specific details for installation.

Performance Specifications: Where built-in-place solutions are not feasible, manufactured systems may be specified. These systems are generally described by their performance characteristics such as providing a specified level of protection to a specific pressure and impulse. Blast resistant windows, doors and anti-shatter film are almost always specified in this manner. When using performance specifications, it is critical that all of the major performance characteristics are included. Equally important is that the specification includes a clear explanation of what the manufacturer must provide in order to prove compliance with the performance requirements. Without this, it is difficult to ensure that the building owner will receive products that meet their requirements. For instance, when specifying blast resistant windows, the following are some of the items that should be included in the specifications:

  • Pressure(s) and Impulse(s) that the windows are to resist.
  • Level of Protection the windows are to meet when subjected to the specified loading.
  • Connection requirements to the supporting wall structure.
  • Proof of Compliance. Proof of compliance may be based on explosive tests or analysis. Most often, proof of compliance will be accomplished through a combination of the two because in order for blast testing to be truly applicable, the tested systems must be of comparable sizes, installed on comparable substrates, and be tested to pressures and impulses at least as large as the ones under consideration. This rarely happens. Most often, blast testing needs to be augmented with project specific blast analysis that will customize the system to the building in question. Without this, blast testing is of almost no practical use in proving compliance with the specifications

Did you know…

…. That All Blast Resistant Film Installations Are Not Created Equal?
Over the years, federal governments, private corporations and international non-governmental organizations have been responding to terrorist attacks on their people and their properties by instituting physical security criteria and requirements.

One of the first measures that is often implemented is the installation of blast resistant (a.k.a. anti-shatter, fragment retention) film on the exterior windows of inhabited and occupied buildings.
There are many valid reasons that film installation is one of the early anti-terrorism measures adopted:

• Glass laceration injuries account for the majority of the personnel injuries (once outside of the close-in blast area) and the installation of blast resistant film can mitigate these injuries.
• The relative cost of blast resistant film installations can be significantly less than many of the other hazard mitigation measures (such as building hardening, protected perimeter installation, relocation of assets from vulnerable locations).
• A blast resistant film installation program can be rapidly implemented.

However, security and facility management personnel should remember that there are many flavors to film applications; that not all existing window systems are appropriate for all window film applications; and that the installation of blast resistant window films will only go so far in protecting the occupants of your buildings.

What is Blast Resistant Film?
Blast Resistant Film is generally a polyester film that is adhered to the interior (occupied side of window) surface of glass and is intended to reduce the number of glass shards propelled into an occupied space by keeping them adhered to the film itself. The film is thicker than traditional solar films and the mounting adhesive (the glue that keeps the glass shards attached t to the film) is more robust than those used for solar or thermal applications.
Blast resistant film does not make the glass itself stronger. Rather, it mitigates hazardous breakage by either holding the glass shards together (and the whole glass/film combination enters the room at a slower velocity than untreated glass) or by retaining the glass/film combination in the frame by attachments of the film to the framing system.

Installation Types
The two basic types of blast resistant film installations are Daylight applied and Attached installations.

• Daylight Application: a Daylight application of blast resistant film refers to installation of the film on the vision portion of the glass pane only, with no attachment to the existing framing system. This is the least expensive approach, but provides less protection than an attached installation.
• Attached Installation: when additional protection is required, the window film can be attached to the existing window framing system. Care must be taken when attaching the film as additional loads will be transferred to the frames and the walls supporting the frames during a blast event. If the existing window or supporting structure is weak (for instance, wood framed windows or unreinforced masonry walls) this can cause more widespread failure – and potentially more injuries – than breaking the glass alone. If the window framing and supporting structure are strong enough to support the loads transmitted then the final system can provide a significant increase in protection over both Daylight installations and non-filmed window systems.

Things to Consider
• Compatibility: Not all film is compatible with all existing panes of glass. Special care should be taken when the existing windows are wire glass, insulating glass units, laminated glass, tinted, have large surface areas, large glass thicknesses or have variations in shading over individual panes of glass. Most film manufacturers have what is known as a “Glass to Film” table that should be reviewed. Most of the restrictions are concerned with avoiding spontaneous glass breakage due to thermal issues. If film is installed on glass that is not within the manufacturers’ recommendations, the warranty may not be valid and you may end up with broken windows.
• Is it Really Blast Film: it is important that the blast film you select has been tested in a blast environment. There are a number of accepted test methodologies that have been developed over the years, these include:

o ASTM F1642 Standard Test Method for Glazing and Glazing Systems Subject to Airblast Loadings;
o GSA-TS01-2003 US General Services Administration Standard Test Method for Glazing and Window Systems Subject to Dynamic Overpressure Loadings;
o GSA Standard Test Method for Glazing and Glazing Systems Subject to Airblast Loadings;
o ISO 16933, Glass in building – Explosion-resistant security glazing –Test and classification for arena air-blast loading;
o ISO 16934, Glass in building – Explosion-resistant security glazing – Test and classification by shock-tube loading.

• Are Existing Window Frames and Walls Strong Enough: If you are looking for the additional protection provided by an Attached Installation, it is important to confirm that the existing window frames and walls are able to support the increased loads that will be created by a blast. Retain the services of a blast consultant to assess your existing conditions.

Will Blast Resistant Film Meet the Protection Requirements of your Facility?
Generally, blast resistant film can increase protection in lower pressure environments (i.e. around 4 or 5 psi (27.5 to 34.5 kPa) for Daylight applications and around 10 psi (69 kPa) for Attached applications) but will rapidly be overcome from higher pressures. Even small VBIED’s can result in pressures far in excess of these limits and the installation of blast film alone will not provide a substantial increase in protection.
When looking at protecting people, buildings and operations from blast effects, there is no single mitigation measure that will adequately meet all needs. Rather, implementation of a variety of measures is most likely required. These may include increasing standoff distances to potential locations of explosive devices, implementing security screening and access restrictions at your facility, mitigating the hazardous effects from window breakage, and hardening your buildings themselves.